Skip to main content
Clean Best logo
Menu
Call 02 5839 30120485 000 860

Zetland NSW 2017

Reviewing the cleaning contract a developer left behind in Zetland

New buildings usually arrive with a cleaning arrangement already in place, chosen by the developer for a building nobody had yet lived in. Reviewing it once the building is occupied is not a criticism of anybody. It is the first sensible thing an owners corporation can do.

Request a fixed quote Call 02 5839 3012

In short

Obtain the existing scope, price and term, then walk the building against it once occupancy has settled. Check whether the areas listed match the building as completed and whether the frequencies match how it is actually used. Only then decide whether to renegotiate, run a comparison, or leave the arrangement in place.

Clean Best is a cleaning contractor that could be either the incumbent or a challenger in that situation rather than an adviser to owners corporations, and no other company is named or rated here. What this page argues for is a review on the evidence, whichever provider ends up holding the arrangement.

Why an inherited scope rarely fits

The arrangement was priced before anybody occupied the building, often from drawings, and against assumptions about how the common areas would be used. Once residents and commercial tenants are in, the reality differs. Entries take more traffic than expected, a lobby gets used as a waiting area, a bin room proves too small, and the scope reflects none of it and nobody in the building was consulted about any of it.

That is not a failure of the developer or the provider. It is the inevitable result of pricing a building nobody had used. What matters is whether anybody reviews it afterwards, because an unreviewed inherited scope quietly becomes the permanent arrangement, and the mismatch is then blamed on the cleaner rather than on the document and the provider is asked to deliver against a description that never fitted.

What to check first

Compare the area list against the building as completed. Late changes during construction routinely add or remove spaces, and a scope written from earlier drawings will not match. Then look at the frequencies against actual use, particularly the entries, lifts, bin areas and any space residents have adopted for a purpose nobody planned and residents have started using spaces in ways nobody anticipated. Photograph anything that differs so the record is unambiguous.

Check the term and the notice provisions as well. Developer-arranged contracts sometimes run longer than an owners corporation would choose, and knowing the exit position determines what your options actually are. If the term is long, the conversation is about renegotiating the scope rather than about changing provider, which is a different discussion entirely and it is worth reading before any decision is discussed at a meeting.

Deciding what to do about it

If the scope is broadly right and the provider is performing, adjust the areas and frequencies and keep the arrangement. Continuity has real value in a new building where the provider has learned the systems, the access and the waste route. Document the changes so the position is clear for whoever sits on the committee next year and it saves the next committee from starting the review again.

If a comparison is warranted, run it properly and invite the incumbent. They know the building better than anybody, which counts for something, and excluding them makes the exercise less useful. Record the reasoning either way, since inherited arrangements attract questions from owners and a short written note answers most of them and it is far easier to write now than to reconstruct later. Owners generally accept a documented outcome readily.

Reviewing an inherited Zetland arrangement

  • Obtain the existing scope, price, term and notice provisions
  • Compare the area list against the building as completed
  • Walk the common areas once occupancy has settled
  • Check frequencies against how spaces are actually used
  • Decide whether to adjust, compare or leave in place
  • Invite the incumbent to any comparison and record the reasoning
Clean Best supervisor checking commercial cleaning quality in a Sydney workplace

Working in Zetland and the Inner South

Zetland in the Inner South is dominated by newer mixed-use developments, retail and apartment common areas, much of it completed recently enough that first cleaning arrangements were set before anybody moved in. Common areas there often include shared entries, lifts, bin rooms and podium spaces used differently from how they were drawn. Clean Best services Zetland from Seven Hills and would expect an inherited arrangement to be reviewed on the evidence once the building is occupied Ask for the existing scope and term before any decision is put to owners.

Questions about Zetland

Can an owners corporation change a developer-appointed cleaner?

That depends on the contract term, the notice provisions and your own delegations, so establish those before deciding anything. Where the term is long, the practical option is renegotiating the scope rather than changing provider. Read the agreement first, since it determines what conversation you are actually able to have Take the agreement to whoever advises the owners corporation if the term is unclear.

When should an inherited arrangement first be reviewed?

Once occupancy has settled, which usually means several months after handover rather than immediately. Reviewing an empty or partly occupied building tells you very little. Waiting until the common areas are being used as they will be used gives you evidence rather than expectations to work from Walk the common areas at a busy hour rather than a quiet one.

What if the scope does not match the building?

Raise it with the provider first, since a scope written from earlier drawings is a documentation problem rather than a performance one. Most providers will adjust the area list readily. Document the revised version and keep it with the building records so the next committee is not working from the original Circulate the revised version to the committee as well.

Should the incumbent be invited to a comparison?

Yes. They know the building, the access, the waste route and the systems, and that knowledge takes a new provider months to acquire. Invite them on the same terms as everybody else. A comparison that excludes the incumbent tends to produce a decision that was effectively made before the process began Judge the proposals rather than the familiarity you already have.

Does Clean Best advise new owners corporations?

No. Clean Best is a cleaning contractor that might be the incumbent or a challenger in this situation rather than an independent adviser, and it names, rates and reviews no other company on this site. What the page argues for is a documented review once the building is genuinely occupied Ask us to be compared on the same terms as any other bidder.

Related pages

Get a fixed written quote for Zetland

Free walkthrough, scope in writing, price back within 24 hours.

Request a quote
Call nowEmail us